Event-related Theta and Gamma Oscillations in Cue-Reactivity Test in Individuals with Opiate Use Disorder in Buprenorphine-Maintenance Program

Authors

  • Estate M Sokhadze Department of Biomedical Sciences University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenvile, SC 29615
  • Mohamed Shaban University of South Alabama, Mobile. AL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.9.1.16

Keywords:

EEG theta and gamma oscillations, phase-amplitude coupling, opioid use disorder, drug cue reactivity, craving, attentional bias

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a major public health problem. Maintenance treatment with medication for OUD (MOUD), such as buprenorphine, has been associated with reductions in physical symptoms of withdrawal, but attentional bias towards drug cues may contribute to the high rates of noncompliance and relapse. The cue-reactivity test can be used to investigate specifics of EEG responses to drug cues. This study was aimed at comparison of EEG oscillations during exposure to drug-related and neutral images in MOUD and control participants for investigation of attention biases persistent in MOUD. We recruited 13 MOUD outpatients and 13 age-matched controls. The cue-reactivity test used emotionally neutral and drug-related images. The study used blocked design (16 images/block, 3 s/image). Time-frequency analysis of EEG from four frontal sites was performed to assess evoked, induced, and late oscillations, and theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling during neutral and drug blocks. Exposure to drug cues in the MOUD group resulted in increased gamma and decreased theta oscillations with higher theta-gamma coupling effect. These cue-reactivity indices reflect heightened attentional bias to drug items and vulnerability to relapse in patients on MOUD and may serve as objective treatment outcomes complementing craving reports and clinical evaluations.

Author Biographies

Estate M Sokhadze, Department of Biomedical Sciences University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenvile, SC 29615

Research professor, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC, 29615

Gratis associate professor, Department of Psychiatry & behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202

Mohamed Shaban, University of South Alabama, Mobile. AL

Mohamed Shaban, Ph.D. is Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering 
University of South Alabama, Mobile. Alabama. He is Senior Member of IEEE.  Dr Shaban is a specialist in quantitative EEG analysis for various applications.

References

Ayanga, D., Shorter, D., & Kosten, T. R. (2016). Update on pharmacotherapy for treatment of opioid use disorder. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 17(17), 2307–2318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2016.1244529

Back, S. E., Gros, D. F., McCauley, J. L., Flanagan, J. C., Cox, E., Barth, K. S., & Brady, K. T. (2014). Laboratory-induced cue reactivity among individuals with prescription opioid dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 39(8), 1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.007

Başar, E. (2013). A review of gamma oscillations in healthy subjects and in cognitive impairment. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.07.005

Bertrand, O., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2000). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans: A possible role for object representation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00166-5

Blanco, C., & Volkow, N. D. (2019). Management of opioid use disorder in the USA: Present status and future directions. The Lancet, 393(10182), 1760–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33078-2

Canolty, R. T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S. S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2006). High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science, 313(5793), 1626–1628. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128115

Canolty, R. T., & Knight, R. T. (2010). The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.001

Carter, B. L., & Tiffany, S. T. (1999). Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction, 94(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9433273.x

Castro, M. K., Bailey, D. H., Zinger, J. F., & Martin, E. A. (2019). Late electrophysiological potentials and emotion in schizophrenia: A meta-analytic review. Schizophrenia Research, 211, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.013

Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7

Dematteis, M., Auriacombe, M., D'Agnone, O., Somaini, L., Szerman, N., Littlewood, R., Alam, F., Alho, H., Benyamina, A., Bobes, J., Daulouede, J. P., Leonardi, C., Maremmani, I., Torrens, M., Walcher, S., & Soyka, M. (2017). Recommendations for buprenorphine and methadone therapy in opioid use disorder: A European consensus. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 18(18), 1987–1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2017.1409722

Drummond, D. C. (2001). Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern. Addiction, 96(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961333.x

Fatseas, M., Denis, C., Massida, Z., Verger, M., Franques-Rénéric, P., & Auriacombe, M. (2011). Cue-induced reactivity, cortisol response and substance use outcome in treated heroin dependent individuals. Biological Psychiatry, 70(8), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.015

Franken, I. H. A., de Haan, H. A., van der Meer, C. W., Haffmans, P. M. J., & Hendriks, V. M. (1999). Cue reactivity and effects of cue exposure in abstinent posttreatment drug users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00004-x

Frankland, L., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2016). Time course of attentional bias to drug cues in opioid dependence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(5), 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000169

Hajcak, G., Dunning, J. P., & Foti, D. (2009). Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: Time-course of the late positive potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.028

Hajcak, G., MacNamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010). Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: An integrative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640903526504

Hajcak, G., & Olvet, D. M. (2008). The persistence of attention to emotion: Brain potentials during and after picture presentation. Emotion, 8(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.250

Hajcak, G., Weinberg, A., MacNamara, A., & Foti, D. (2011). ERPs and study of emotion. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 361–372). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Herrmann, C. S., & Demiralp, T. (2005). Human EEG gamma oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(12), 2719–2733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.007

Herrmann, C. S., & Mecklinger, A. (2000). Magnetoencephalographic responses to illusory figures: Early evoked gamma is affected by processing of stimulus features. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00170-7

Herrmann, C. S., Rach, S., Vosskuhl, J., & Strüber, D. (2014). Time–frequency analysis of event-related potentials: A brief tutorial. Brain Topography, 27(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0327-5

Hyman, S. M., Fox, H., Hong, K.-I., Doebrick, C., & Sinha, R. (2007). Stress and drug-cue-induced craving in opioid-dependent individuals in naltrexone treatment. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.134

Köster, M., Martens, U., & Gruber, T. (2019). Memory entrainment by visually evoked theta-gamma coupling. NeuroImage, 188, 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.002

Köster, M., Friese, U., Schöne, B., Trujillo-Barreto, N., & Gruber, T. (2014). Theta–gamma coupling during episodic retrieval in the human EEG. Brain Research, 1577, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.06.028

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. (Tech. Rep. No. A–5). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

Lisman, J. E., & Jensen, O. (2013). The θ-γ neural code. Neuron, 77(6), 1002–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007

Lubman, D. I., Peters, L. A., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Deakin, J. F. W. (2000). Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychological Medicine, 30(1), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799001269

MacLean, R. R., Sofuoglu, M., Brede, E., Robinson, C., & Waters, A. J. (2018). Attentional bias in opioid users: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 191, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.012

McKernan, L. C., Nash, M. R., Gottdiener, W. H., Anderson, S. E., Lambert, W. E., & Carr, E. R. (2015). Further evidence of self-medication: Personality factors influencing drug choice in substance use disorders. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 43(2), 243–275. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2015.43.2.243

Ortiz, E., Coleman, A., Pericot-Valverde, I., Byrne, K., Litwin, A., Shaban, M., & Sokhadze, E. (2021). Pictorial cue reactivity and craving measures in individuals with opiate use disorder enrolled in buprenorphine-maintenance program. International Journal for Psychophysiology, 168 (Suppl.), S137–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.07.395

Osipova, D., Takashima, A., Oostenveld, R., Fernández, G., Maris, E., & Jensen, O. (2006). Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(28), 7523–7531. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1948-06.2006

Robbins, S. J., & Ehrman, R. N. (2004). The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(4), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582305275423

Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363(1507), 3137–3146. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0093

Rosenberg, H. (2009). Clinical and laboratory assessment of the subjective experience of drug craving. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.002

Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 257–261.

Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00174.x

Simojoki, K., Vorma, H., & Alho, H. (2008). A retrospective evaluation of patients switched from buprenorphine (Subutex) to the buprenorphine/naloxone combination (Suboxone). Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 3, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-16

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2019). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068, NSDUH Series H-54). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Tallon-Baudry, C. (2003). Oscillatory synchrony and human visual cognition. Journal of Physiology–Paris, 97(2–3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.09.009

Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01299-1

Torrence, C., & Compo, G. P. (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2

Torrado, M., Silva, H., Eusébio, S., Fred, A., & Ouakinin, S. (2015). Alexithymia, physiological reactivity and cognitive appraisals of emotional stimuli in opiate dependents: A pilot study. Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.1000263

Tort, A. B. L., Komorowski, R., Eichenbaum, H., & Kopell, N. (2010). Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(2), 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00106.2010

Wang, W. (2021). Brain network features based on theta–gamma cross-frequency coupling connections in EEG for emotion recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 761, 136106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136106

Wiens, S., Sand, A., & Olofsson, J. K. (2011). Nonemotional features suppress early and enhance late emotional electrocortical responses to negative pictures. Biological Psychology, 86(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.11.001

Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A., & Fiez, J. A. (2004). Prefrontal responses to drug cues: A neurocognitive analysis. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1200

Zhu, Z., Ye, Z., Wang, H., Hua, T., Wen, Q., & Zhang, C. (2019). Theta–gamma coupling in the prelimbic area is associated with heroin addiction. Neuroscience Letters, 701, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.02.020

Zijlstra, F., Veltman, D. J., Booij, J., van den Brink, W., & Franken, I. H. A. (2009). Neurobiological substrates of cue-elicited craving and anhedonia in recently abstinent opioid-dependent males. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 99(1–3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.07.012

Downloads

Published

2022-03-27

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Research Papers

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).