Response Process Validation Protocol using Neurophenomenological Gamma Asymmetry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.5.3.93Keywords:
gamma asymmetry, response process validity, industrial/organizational psychology, organizational neuroscience, sLORETA, approach-avoidance, data triangulationAbstract
In the process of designing a continuous improvement process for a set of personal attribute self-reporting assessments, an opportunity was seen to combine assessment analytics with brain activity to capture decision-making pathways while responding to assessment items. This pilot triangulation process is designed to address response process validation, as described by The American Psychological Association to begin to better understand whether the responder is following the intended purpose of the assessment. Method: The protocol involves collecting electroencephalographic (EEG) data, using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) to analyze and view voxel images of real-time brain activity collected while a participant responds to assessment items. This analysis examines gamma asymmetry in the frontal lobes, as well as opening the door to further wave comparisons in the future. Conclusions: The protocols used to expose the mindset of assessment responders will be shared, as well as pilot insights gained as a result of this imaging process. By collecting images from the moment of stimulus exposure to the moment that the respondent selects a likert scale answer, insights are gathered that include: how final answers compare to brain processing data, brain decision-making pathways when exposed to reverse or double negative assessment items, exposure of brain processing when faced with socially loaded statements, resulting brain processing of neutrally scored stimulus, and insights gained when all of this data is cross-walked against quantitative item analysis of population data such as inter-item correlations and item factor loading based on exploratory factor analysis.
References
Bonnstetter, B. J., Bonnstetter, R. J., Hebets, D., & Collura, T. F. (2015). U.S. Patent No. 9,060,702. Validation process for ipsative assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Bonnstetter, R. J., Hebets, D., & Wigton, N. L. (2015). Frontal gamma asymmetry in response to soft skills stimuli: A pilot study. NeuroRegulation, 2(2), 70–85, http://dx.doi.org /10.15540/nr.2.2.70
Collura, T. F., Wigton, N. L., Zalaquett, C., Chatters-Smith, S., & Bonnstetter, R. J. (2016). The value of EEG-based electromagnetic tomographic analysis in human performance and mental health. Biofeedback, 44(2), 58–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5298/1081-5937-44.2.03
Collura, T. F., Zalaquett, C., & Bonnstetter, R. J. (2014). Seeing inside the client's mind. Counseling Today, 57(6), 24–27.
Collura, T. F., Zalaquett, C., Bonnstetter, R. J., & Chatters S. (2014). Towards an operational model of decision-making, emotional regulation, and mental health impact. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 28(4), 18–33.
Owen, W. J., Borowsky, R., & Sarty, G. E. (2004). FMRI of two measures of phonological processing in visual word recognition: Ecological validity matters. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 40–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00418-8
Sireci, S. G., & Sukin, T. (2013). Test Validity. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J.-I. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA Handbook of Testing and Assessment in Psychology, Volume 1: Test Theory and Testing and Assessment in Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Ch. 4, pp. 61–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org /10.1037/14047-004
TTI Success Insights. (2018, August 21). Style Insights (Behaviors) Instrument Introduction. Retrieved from https://www.ttisuccessinsights.com/products/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).